WHICH THE FUNCTION OF THE PRESS? Regarding the controversy between
Eugenio Scalfari and Ferruccio De Bortoli about the attitude of the latter and his Corriere della Sera to Berlusconi and his government, I think he Scalfari region and explain why. Berlusconi is wrong to accuse "Il Corriere della Sera" of hostility against him because the newspaper has always been very moderate in commenting on the measures the Government is that the personal lives of our Prime Minister. But De Bortoli also wrong to want to prove at all costs its "impartiality" with a worried tone of one who feels in danger. I wonder, then, how does the function of the free press director of the Corriere. Perhaps that has always obliged to be equidistant, which means giving a shot at the rim and a barrel? Or rather, as I believe, be the sentinel the errors or abuses of those in power to make them correct? And on the person of Mr Berlusconi as you do not be bitter, heavily critics as "La Repubblica" rightly? E 'was democratically elected, of course, but that does not mean he can do what he wants, let alone trying to subvert, in fact before the law, our republican institutions. He made the laws or not "ad personam"? E 'or not the bearer of a conflict of interests as big as a house? Put or not to ban journalists agree with his point? He justified or not tax evaders? It 's true or not that her groom was a mafioso Mangano? It 's true or not that his friend and parliamentary Dell'Utri was convicted for collusion with the Mafia? It 's true or not that his minister (Lunardi) has argued that one has to live with the Mafia? Or has not suggested that the businesses not to advertise in some newspapers because he did not favor? He has led or not at Palazzo Grazioli, which is the institutional forum, taking advantage of their services of prostitutes? E 'or not was the protagonist in the international field of memorable gaffes against Heads of State or Government of foreigners? He has not dodged or processes and judgments due to time limitation shortened from its parliamentary majority? E 'or not I recognized, by ruling that the lawyer. Mills has received money from Fininvest for bear false witness? E 'state or not recognized by res judicata that Previti, his trusted lawyer, bribed a judge in the matter Mondadori? So, I ask De Bortoli, like a free newspaper to be warm and "equidistant" against a character like that, as we have seen, is not satisfied with just that? I think the cerchiobottismo should not be the hallmark of a free press. I feel close to Scalfari, Santoro, Labor and others who have the courage to expose the skeletons in the 'cabinet of those who govern us.
Eugenio Scalfari and Ferruccio De Bortoli about the attitude of the latter and his Corriere della Sera to Berlusconi and his government, I think he Scalfari region and explain why. Berlusconi is wrong to accuse "Il Corriere della Sera" of hostility against him because the newspaper has always been very moderate in commenting on the measures the Government is that the personal lives of our Prime Minister. But De Bortoli also wrong to want to prove at all costs its "impartiality" with a worried tone of one who feels in danger. I wonder, then, how does the function of the free press director of the Corriere. Perhaps that has always obliged to be equidistant, which means giving a shot at the rim and a barrel? Or rather, as I believe, be the sentinel the errors or abuses of those in power to make them correct? And on the person of Mr Berlusconi as you do not be bitter, heavily critics as "La Repubblica" rightly? E 'was democratically elected, of course, but that does not mean he can do what he wants, let alone trying to subvert, in fact before the law, our republican institutions. He made the laws or not "ad personam"? E 'or not the bearer of a conflict of interests as big as a house? Put or not to ban journalists agree with his point? He justified or not tax evaders? It 's true or not that her groom was a mafioso Mangano? It 's true or not that his friend and parliamentary Dell'Utri was convicted for collusion with the Mafia? It 's true or not that his minister (Lunardi) has argued that one has to live with the Mafia? Or has not suggested that the businesses not to advertise in some newspapers because he did not favor? He has led or not at Palazzo Grazioli, which is the institutional forum, taking advantage of their services of prostitutes? E 'or not was the protagonist in the international field of memorable gaffes against Heads of State or Government of foreigners? He has not dodged or processes and judgments due to time limitation shortened from its parliamentary majority? E 'or not I recognized, by ruling that the lawyer. Mills has received money from Fininvest for bear false witness? E 'state or not recognized by res judicata that Previti, his trusted lawyer, bribed a judge in the matter Mondadori? So, I ask De Bortoli, like a free newspaper to be warm and "equidistant" against a character like that, as we have seen, is not satisfied with just that? I think the cerchiobottismo should not be the hallmark of a free press. I feel close to Scalfari, Santoro, Labor and others who have the courage to expose the skeletons in the 'cabinet of those who govern us.
0 comments:
Post a Comment