a democratic party always transparent with Luciano Canova
agree on the need for an open debate between supporters of the three different motions that are owned by Bersani, Franceschini and Marino.
does not offer as otherwise people can make an informed choice between a case of the three candidates, except for personal sympathy vote only regardless of the respective programs. It would therefore be good if the local party, made up of good people motivated and positively promoted the direct confrontation between the supporters of the three candidates to the secretary of the party. It 'surely the weak argument of those who see the risk of providing such an image of internal bickering. Apart from the fact that civil expose his case does not involve fighting, but it seems to me a fear that goes hand in hand with what at the time advised the center-left does not pass a law against conflict of interest Berlusconi. In contrast, the image will be that of a party that, unlike others, discusses in full freedom and sunshine, democratically. And this diversity, with respect to the Party of Freedom, where an employer prefers to defend their interests with those of the real country, should be to boast and pride. And it could boast even better if this diversity, even here I fully agree with Canova, knowing the high standards set characters apart from reports from the results discussed and so little exciting, like Bassolino and Loiero. Even more than the PD shows you really want to change things if, as a reformist party is prefiggesse in its programs, a theme that appears only in passing in the three motions, to implement the "reform the reforms" to this country, that the real struggle to Cosa Nostra, the 'Ndrangheta and the Camorra. Not easy but essential goal. Without this "reform" Italy is bound to decline even more than has already occurred in recent years, from the point of view, cultural, social and economic development.
agree on the need for an open debate between supporters of the three different motions that are owned by Bersani, Franceschini and Marino.
does not offer as otherwise people can make an informed choice between a case of the three candidates, except for personal sympathy vote only regardless of the respective programs. It would therefore be good if the local party, made up of good people motivated and positively promoted the direct confrontation between the supporters of the three candidates to the secretary of the party. It 'surely the weak argument of those who see the risk of providing such an image of internal bickering. Apart from the fact that civil expose his case does not involve fighting, but it seems to me a fear that goes hand in hand with what at the time advised the center-left does not pass a law against conflict of interest Berlusconi. In contrast, the image will be that of a party that, unlike others, discusses in full freedom and sunshine, democratically. And this diversity, with respect to the Party of Freedom, where an employer prefers to defend their interests with those of the real country, should be to boast and pride. And it could boast even better if this diversity, even here I fully agree with Canova, knowing the high standards set characters apart from reports from the results discussed and so little exciting, like Bassolino and Loiero. Even more than the PD shows you really want to change things if, as a reformist party is prefiggesse in its programs, a theme that appears only in passing in the three motions, to implement the "reform the reforms" to this country, that the real struggle to Cosa Nostra, the 'Ndrangheta and the Camorra. Not easy but essential goal. Without this "reform" Italy is bound to decline even more than has already occurred in recent years, from the point of view, cultural, social and economic development.
0 comments:
Post a Comment