Companies That Are Willing To Donate To Schools

a democratic party always transparent with Luciano Canova
agree on the need for an open debate between supporters of the three different motions that are owned by Bersani, Franceschini and Marino.
does not offer as otherwise people can make an informed choice between a case of the three candidates, except for personal sympathy vote only regardless of the respective programs. It would therefore be good if the local party, made up of good people motivated and positively promoted the direct confrontation between the supporters of the three candidates to the secretary of the party. It 'surely the weak argument of those who see the risk of providing such an image of internal bickering. Apart from the fact that civil expose his case does not involve fighting, but it seems to me a fear that goes hand in hand with what at the time advised the center-left does not pass a law against conflict of interest Berlusconi. In contrast, the image will be that of a party that, unlike others, discusses in full freedom and sunshine, democratically. And this diversity, with respect to the Party of Freedom, where an employer prefers to defend their interests with those of the real country, should be to boast and pride. And it could boast even better if this diversity, even here I fully agree with Canova, knowing the high standards set characters apart from reports from the results discussed and so little exciting, like Bassolino and Loiero. Even more than the PD shows you really want to change things if, as a reformist party is prefiggesse in its programs, a theme that appears only in passing in the three motions, to implement the "reform the reforms" to this country, that the real struggle to Cosa Nostra, the 'Ndrangheta and the Camorra. Not easy but essential goal. Without this "reform" Italy is bound to decline even more than has already occurred in recent years, from the point of view, cultural, social and economic development.

How Does A Haematoma Dissolve

WHICH THE FUNCTION OF THE PRESS? Regarding the controversy between
Eugenio Scalfari and Ferruccio De Bortoli about the attitude of the latter and his Corriere della Sera to Berlusconi and his government, I think he Scalfari region and explain why. Berlusconi is wrong to accuse "Il Corriere della Sera" of hostility against him because the newspaper has always been very moderate in commenting on the measures the Government is that the personal lives of our Prime Minister. But De Bortoli also wrong to want to prove at all costs its "impartiality" with a worried tone of one who feels in danger. I wonder, then, how does the function of the free press director of the Corriere. Perhaps that has always obliged to be equidistant, which means giving a shot at the rim and a barrel? Or rather, as I believe, be the sentinel the errors or abuses of those in power to make them correct? And on the person of Mr Berlusconi as you do not be bitter, heavily critics as "La Repubblica" rightly? E 'was democratically elected, of course, but that does not mean he can do what he wants, let alone trying to subvert, in fact before the law, our republican institutions. He made the laws or not "ad personam"? E 'or not the bearer of a conflict of interests as big as a house? Put or not to ban journalists agree with his point? He justified or not tax evaders? It 's true or not that her groom was a mafioso Mangano? It 's true or not that his friend and parliamentary Dell'Utri was convicted for collusion with the Mafia? It 's true or not that his minister (Lunardi) has argued that one has to live with the Mafia? Or has not suggested that the businesses not to advertise in some newspapers because he did not favor? He has led or not at Palazzo Grazioli, which is the institutional forum, taking advantage of their services of prostitutes? E 'or not was the protagonist in the international field of memorable gaffes against Heads of State or Government of foreigners? He has not dodged or processes and judgments due to time limitation shortened from its parliamentary majority? E 'or not I recognized, by ruling that the lawyer. Mills has received money from Fininvest for bear false witness? E 'state or not recognized by res judicata that Previti, his trusted lawyer, bribed a judge in the matter Mondadori? So, I ask De Bortoli, like a free newspaper to be warm and "equidistant" against a character like that, as we have seen, is not satisfied with just that? I think the cerchiobottismo should not be the hallmark of a free press. I feel close to Scalfari, Santoro, Labor and others who have the courage to expose the skeletons in the 'cabinet of those who govern us.

What Kind Of Iron On Printer?

WHY 'FINANCE WITH MY CHARGES OF NEWSPAPERS KNIGHT? Victor Felts, from Berlusconi's faithful hound, from which, as he claims, does not receive orders (in fact there is no need, he knows well how to please the boss), has unleashed on the pages of his daily campaign against the subscription Rai. If this incitement to succeed, to take advantage of it, incidentally, would be especially Mediaset. I too would prefer not to pay any fee but I would also like the public TV is not like those of Berlusconi, for the most vulgar entertainment, adulation towards the Premier and aggressive advertising. Not that anything like the public TV will not dispense, but also transmits at least some things of value, serious professionals with the likes of Fazio, Gabanelli Floris, Dandini, Iacona, and why not?, Santoro. And those who just happen to be a nuisance, because it tells a truth other than pleasing to the Premier and his courtiers. I'm not saying that should be deleted, such as the sale program, delicious and obsequious landlord when he is, but I wish I could hear the other bells, as democracy requires. Besides, if people like Rai lodge for sale, Minzolini, Scarlett Mimum and, if prevalent in Mediaset journalists like Faith, is just, for pluralism of information, which can work in a professional non rai Friends Berlusconi, Travaglio understood. And if we, as Felt ago, on ' financial aspect, then I say that I gladly pay the TV license because there are those serious professionals. And I'm very sorry to know that, by the taxpayer, funds also inadvertently "Il Giornale". How can I make my taxes do not go to bankroll this newspaper?